Analysis of the Effectiveness of Article 36 Paragraph 3 of Law No. 32 Year 2002 on Broadcasting for Child Viewers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37010/postulat.v3i1.1906Keywords:
television, entertainment, information, effectivenessAbstract
Television remains one of the main media for entertainment and information in Indonesia, even though digital media and streaming platforms are now increasingly developing. Watching television is a common activity among families, especially as a moment of togetherness after activities. However, along with the variety of shows provided by television stations, concerns have arisen regarding content that is not suitable for children. Shows that contain elements of violence, lies, slander, harassment, and even sensitive issues such as SARA and LGBT have the potential to damage children's psychological and social development. Therefore, it is important for parents to be more selective in controlling the shows their children consume. This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of Article 36 paragraph 3 of Law Number 32 of 2002 concerning Broadcasting in protecting children's broadcasts and how supervision and sanctions are applied to television stations that violate these provisions. This research uses qualitative normative legal research methods, with a focus on literature study and visual documentation analysis that utilizes primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that there are gaps in supervision and law enforcement regarding the broadcasting of children's shows in accordance with existing regulations. It is hoped that this research can provide input in developing broadcasting policies that are more effective and fairer for child protection in Indonesia.
References
Andriagus, R. T. (2017). Sistem pendukung keputusan untuk menentukan kualitas stasiun televisi sebagai konsumsi terbaik bagi masyarakat dengan menggunakan metode AHP. JurTI: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 1(1), 68–73.
Adityas Pratama, E., Heliany, I., & S., E. (2023). Terhadap anak yang dilakukan oleh pelaku anak (Studi kasus putusan nomor 2/Pid. Sus. Anak). 3(1), 27–51.
Gemiharto, I., Abdullah, A., & Puspitasari, L. (2017). Kajian kritis tayangan televisi favorit kelas menengah perkotaan (Studi kasus tayangan televisi favorit kelompok masyarakat kelas menengah di Kota Bandung, Provinsi Jawa Barat). 1, 13–29. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/protvf
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2024). Teguran untuk program Brownis Trans TV oleh KPI. Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. https://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/edaran-dan-sanksi
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2023). Laporan kinerja KPI Agustus 2019 - Desember 2022. Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. https://www.kpi.go.id
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2024a). Laporan pelanggaran siaran KPI. Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. https://www.kpi.go.id/index.php/id/edaran-dan-sanksi
Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. (2024b). Teguran Jodoh Wasiat Bapak. Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia.
Lembaran, T., & Republik, N. (2016). Pedoman perilaku penyiaran (P3) dan standar program siaran. Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. http://www.kpi.go.id/download/regulasi/P3SPS_2012_Final.pdf
Septiani, E. (2019). Tantangan di era 4.0 pada penyajian program televisi terhadap penggunaan bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pujangga, 5(1).
Batoebara, U. (2017). Media televisi sebagai agen sosialisasi dalam aksi 212 damai