The Implementation of Information Technology within the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia to Facilitate the Handling of Case Files
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37010/postulat.v2i2.1669Keywords:
information technology, cases settlement, Supreme CourtAbstract
A case settlement between the party who is the victim and the party who is the perpetrator is known as case dispute resolution. The process of resolving a case can take one of two forms: through litigation (in the court) or non-litigation (outside of court). Using methods from a literature review, the purpose of this study is to examine how digital justice is affected by technology and innovation in law enforcement. The application of information technology to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of time in handling case files, particularly at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, has changed the way law enforcement operates in the ever-growing digital era. These technological developments include big data analysis, artificial intelligence, and digital forensic technology. Indonesia. This study's problem formulation is as follows: 1) How are cases resolved in court? 2) How are efforts to speed up the resolution of cases in court according to PERMA Number 4 of 2020 concerning Electronic Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Court? Legal behavioral products, such as reviewing laws, are used in normative case studies in normative legal research methods (normative law study). The issuance of PERMA Number 4 in 2020 will accelerate the resolution of cases in court through administrative procedures and electronic broadcasting. This could increase the effectiveness and efficiency of broadcasting principles and reduce the broadcasting of cases in court, particularly given the existence of PERMA Number 1 in 2019.
References
Agung, M. (2015). Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2014. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung.
Agung, S. N. (n.d.). SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung.
Excellence, T. I. (2013). The International Framework for Court Excellence (Edisi 2, Maret 2013).
Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009, Lembaran Negara No. 157 Tahun 2009, Tambahan Lembaran Negara No. 5076.
Mamudji, S. S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marzuki, P. M. (2008). Penelitian Hukum (Cet. 2). Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (1993). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Muhammad, A. K. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum (Cet. 1). Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nursobah, A. (2015). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Untuk Mendorong Percepatan Penyelesaian Perkara di Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 4(2), 99-113.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan Secara Elektronik, Nomor 1 Tahun 2019.
Pudjoharsoyo, A. S. (2019, 13 Agustus). Arah Kebijakan Teknis Pemberlakuan Pengadilan Elektronik: Kebutuhan Sarana dan Prasarana Serta Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta.
Rahmawati, D. (2008). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, 5(1), 107.
Reiling, D. (2009). Technology for Justice: How Information Technology Can Support Judicial Reform. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
RI, M. A. (2007). Laporan Tahunan 2006. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.
Rosita. (2017). Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi dan Non Litigasi). Al-Bayyinah: Journal of Islamic Law, 6(2), 99-113.
Rusli, H. (2006). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Bagaimana?. Law Review Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan, 5(3).
Satria, R. (2023, 19 Desember). Persidangan Secara Elektronik (E-Litigasi) di Pengadilan Agama. Diakses dari https://www.pa-sukadana.go.id
Soekanto, S. (2008). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Cet. ke-11). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Soemartono, G. (2006). Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sunggono, B. (1997). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sutarman. (2009). Pengantar Teknologi Informasi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Suyudi, A., & Tjandra, S. (2010). Pemetaan Implementasi Teknologi Informasi di Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan.
Secara maknawi adagium justice delay is justice denied tertulis dalam Magna Charta (n.d.).
