Learning Style with Sensory Preference Approach as Teacher Capacity Development in Teaching

Authors

  • Mutmainah SMP - SMA Mawaddah Kota Depok
  • Andi Muhammad Rudhan STIE Tunas Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37010/int.v2i1.343

Keywords:

learning styles, sensory preferences, teacher capacity

Abstract

In addition to measuring the initial characteristics of students, it is necessary to know to map out the proper teaching flow. The characteristics of the learner are factors that must be taken into account when choosing learning media. These factors include the number of students and social background to determine the provision of examples in the media; in this case, learning styles are included. This study aims to provide a strategy for developing teacher capacity, especially in delivering material according to students' sensory preferences. Semi-structured interviews were applied to informants to obtain critical information and develop things that need to be known to enrich this research. The results showed that 20%-30% of students tend auditory modality, 40% visual, and 30-40% kinesthetic. However, what is of concern is the awareness of teachers who do not understand the importance of delivering learning according to the modalities of children's learning styles according to their sensory preferences. In this study, researchers used ISO: 21001/2018 (quality management system) as a reference and strategic step for teacher capacity development.

References

Abidin, Z. (2016). Penerapan Pemilihan Media Pembelajaran. Edcomtech, 1(1), 9–20.

Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2018). ISO: 21001/2018 Sistem Manajemen Pendidikan. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional

Bire, A. L., Geradus, U., & Bire, J. (2014). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Dan Kinestetik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 44(2), 128164. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v44i2.5307

Coffield, F. (2004). Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.

Dalem, K., Dewi, W. P., Purbojo, R., Sutanto, S. H., & Anggreany, Y. (2018). PENGENALAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA BAGI GURU-GURU. PKM-CRM, 1, 1272–1281.

Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching Students through their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical Approach. Reston: Prentice Hall

García-Pérez, M. Á., & Alcalá-Quintana, R. (2019). The Do’s and Don’ts of Psychophysical Methods for Interpretability of Psychometric Functions and Their Descriptors. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2019, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.49

Gilakjani, A. P. & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The Effect of Visual , Auditory , and Kinaesthetic Learning Styles on Language Teaching. International Conferences on Social Science and Huminity, 5(June), 469–472.

Marliani, R. (2018). Pengukuran Dalam Penelitian Psikologi. Psympathic?: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 3(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v3i1.2180

McIntosh, M. J., & Morse, J. M. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674

Pratama, U. (2020). Analisis Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Seni Pertunjukan Berdasarkan Modalitas Preferensi Sensori. JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran): Kajian Dan Riset Dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran, 7(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.17977/um031v7i22020p107

Robbani, H., Megayanti, W., & Prasmoro, A. V. (2020). Formative Assessment Strategies Using Elearning. NUCLEUS, 1(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.37010/nuc.v1i1.85

Sreenidhi, S. K., & Tay Chinyi, H. (2017). Styles of Learning Based on the Research of Fernald, Keller, Orton, Gillingham, Stillman , Montessori and Neil D Fleming. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field, 3(4), 17–25.

Published

2021-03-29

How to Cite

Mutmainah, M., & Rudhan, A. M. (2021). Learning Style with Sensory Preference Approach as Teacher Capacity Development in Teaching. INTELEKTIUM, 2(1), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.37010/int.v2i1.343
Abstract viewed = 230 times