Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penculikan dan Pencabulan Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cibinong Nomor 512/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Cbi)

Authors

  • Krisdianto Prabowo IBLAM School of Law
  • Bintang Wicaksono Ajie IBLAM School of Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37010/fcs.v5i2.1660

Keywords:

obscenity, legal protection, judge's consideration

Abstract

Sexual abuse is one of the crimes frequently occurring today. Perpetrators of this crime can come from various backgrounds, both male and female, young and old. The victims of this crime vary as well, not only adults but also children often fall prey to it. Sexual abuse involves acts that violate norms of decency and morality, concerning sexual organs or other body parts that stimulate sexually. For example, a case decided by the Cibinong District Court under decision number 512/Pid.Sus/2022/PN Cbi is the focus of this study. The research centers on analyzing the judge's considerations in issuing that verdict and legal protection for children who are victims of sexual abuse. The research methodology used is normative juridical, examining theories, concepts, and related legal regulations. The research findings indicate that the Cibinong District Court sentenced the defendant to 8 years in prison and imposed a fine of Rp. 800,000,000,-. However, the author argues that the judge's decision did not meet expectations, considering the criminal penalties should have been more severe under the Child Protection Act. Additionally, the psychological impact and trauma experienced by victims of sexual abuse must be carefully considered, as they can have long-term and profoundly serious effects on the victims. Sexual abuse is regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) under the section dealing with crimes against decency. Article 290 of the KUHP stipulates a maximum prison sentence of seven years, while the Child Protection Act provides for harsher penalties ranging from 5 to 15 years of imprisonment, and a maximum fine of Rp. 5,000,000,000,-..

References

Adami Chazawi. (2007). Tindak Pidana Mengenai Kesopanan: Vol. Halaman 80. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arief Gosita. (2012). “Masalah Perlindungan Anak”, dalam Nashriana, Perlindungan Hukum Pidana bagi Anak di Indonesia : Vol. Halaman 2. Rajawali Pers.

Arif Gosita. (1983). Masalah Korban Kejahatan: Vol. Halaman 79. Akademika Pressindo.

BuddyKu. (2023, September 14). Ratusan Kasus Penculikan Anak Terjadi di Indonesia, Orang Tua Harus Lebih Perhatian. RCTI Plus.

Fauzi, R., Huda, M. Al, & Rustam, M. R. (2023). Sanksi Hukum Bagi Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Kekerasan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 25/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/Pn Bks).

Fitria Maharani, Z. M. Y. K. M. (2002). 939-2267-1-SM. Undang-Undang RI Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang RI Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak, Hal-87.

Johnny Ibrahim. (2005). Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Vol. Halaman 145-146. Bayu Media.

Munir Fuady. (2007). Dinamika Teori Hukum: Vol. Halaman 6. Ghalia Indonesia.

Nahar. (2023, February 21). Kasus Penculikan Anak Telah 14 Orang. JAKARTA.NIAGA.ASIA .

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2008a). Penelitian Hukum: Vol. Halaman 29. Kencana.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2008b). Penelitian Hukum: Vol. Halaman 29. Kencana.

Satjipto Raharjo. (2000). Ilmu Hukum: Vol. Halaman 53. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Published

2024-08-15

How to Cite

Prabowo, K., & Ajie, B. W. (2024). Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penculikan dan Pencabulan Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Cibinong Nomor 512/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Cbi). FOCUS, 5(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.37010/fcs.v5i2.1660
Abstract viewed = 46 times