Juridical Review Cancellation of Graduation of Applicants in Procurement of Civil Servants due to Incompatibility of Educational Qualifications

Authors

  • Risang Pujiyanto Politeknik ATK Yogyakarta
  • Sonny Taufan Politeknik STMI Jakarta
  • Rr Gumilar Tw PEM Akamigas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v4i2.853

Keywords:

each procurement of civil servants, the principle of contrario actus, general principles of good government

Abstract

This study has the aim of analyzing the cancellation of the graduation status of Civil Servant procurement applicants whose educational qualifications are not in accordance with those that have been established and only known in the future. This research uses normative legal research methodology with a statute approach. The results of the study found that Government Regulation Number 11 of 2017 concerning Management of Civil Servants as amended by Government Regulation Number 17 of 2020 only regulates the dismissal of Candidates for Civil Servants and does not explicitly regulate the cancellation of graduation. The provisions in Government Regulation Number 11 of 2017 mutatis mutandis apply to the cancellation of the graduation status of applicants who have educational qualifications that do not match, with the limitation that applicants have provided incorrect information regarding their educational qualifications. The principle of contrario actus stipulates that the Staffing Officer is the official authorized to revoke/cancel a decision due to a substance defect in the form of a factual discrepancy regarding educational qualifications caused by the applicant. However, the cancellation of the applicant's graduation cannot be done if the incompatibility of educational qualifications is caused by the inaccuracy of the Civil Service Procurement Committee. This is because there is the principle of mistakes made by State Administrative Officials in issuing decisions that cannot result in losses for justice seekers/society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hadjon, P. M. (2015). Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Konteks Undang-Undang No. 30 Th. 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 4, No 1, 57.

HR, R. (2017). Hukum Administrasi Negara. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika dan Penggunaanya dalam Penalaran dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16 NO 3, 306.

Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara. (2018). Pemetaan Penerapan Sistem Merit dalam Manajemen Aparatur Sipil Negara. Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara.

Mahkamah Agung. (2007). Pedoman Teknis Administrasi dan Teknis Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Buku II. Mahkamah Agung. http://perpustakaan bidak.mahkamahagung.go.id/indeks.php?p=show_detail&ide-3311&keyos

Manan, B. (2009). Hukum Kewarganegaraan Indonesia Dalam UU No. 18 Tahun 2016. FH UII Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Prenadamedia Group.

MD, S. M., & Mahfud, M. (2011). Pokok Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara. Liberty.

Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2021. 40. https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Permen-PANRB-No.-27-Tahun-2021.pdf.

Okezone, T. (2021). 4 Fakta Pendaftaran CPNS 2021, Pelamar Tunggu Hasil Seleksi Administrasi. Okezone.

Ombudsman RI. (2019). Laporan Tahunan 2018 Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.

Ombudsman RI. (2020). Laporan Tahunan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019. Ombudsman Republik Indonesia, 92..pdf

Pemerintah RI. (2014). Undang–Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, Administrasi pemerintahan, 99.

Philipus M Hadjon, et. al. (2015). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pujiyanto, R.Dkk, (2018). Limits on The Implementation of Contrario actus Principle in The Procurement of Civil Servants. Jurnal Unifikasi, 5, No 2, 77.

Putra, H. P. (2020). Penilaian Terhadap Batal atau Tidak Sahnya Keputusan Dan/Atau Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Vol 3, No, 45.

Rusiana, D. A. (2021). Ombudsman Sebut Nama Program Studi Jadi Masalah Krusial di Seleksi Administrasi CPNS-PPPK. IDX Channel. https://www.idxchannel.com/economics/ombudsman-sebut-nama-program-studi-jadi-masalah-krusial-di-seleksi-administrasi-cpns-pppk

Saptoyo, R. D. A. (2021). Jurusan Tak Sesuai Bikin Tak Lolos Administrasi CPNS 2021, Benarkah? Kompas.

Sembiring, L. J. (2021). Lowongan CPNS 2021 Dibuka, Ini Syarat Hingga Formasi. CNBC Indonesia. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20210629215533-4-256915/lowongan-cpns-2021-dibuka-ini-syarat-hingga-formasi/3

Simanungkalit, J. H. U. P. (2008). Strategi Pengadaan Calon Pegawai Negeri Sipil Yang Berkualitas. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Manajemen PNS 2, 01, 60.

Soehino. (2000). Asas-Asas Umum Tata Usaha Negara. Liberty.

Syuhudi, I. (2017). Implementasi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik Di Lingkungan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Pena Justisia, Vol 17, No, 13–14.

Undang Undang Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. 1–66.

Published

2022-10-16

How to Cite

Pujiyanto, R., Taufan , S., & Tw, R. G. . (2022). Juridical Review Cancellation of Graduation of Applicants in Procurement of Civil Servants due to Incompatibility of Educational Qualifications. LITERATUS, 4(2), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v4i2.853
Abstract viewed = 99 times