Digital Education

A Review of Google for Education

Authors

  • Wulan Yulian Anggini Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Danang Dwi Harmoko Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v3i1.236

Keywords:

Google for Education, Digital Learning, Education Technology

Abstract

In 2020, internet users in Indonesia reached 73.7% or as many as 196.7 million people. This data illustrates the high penetration of the internet in various aspects of people's lives. One aspect is education where all teaching activities are carried out online. This sudden and massive change poses a challenge to the Indonesian education ecosystem, including technology infrastructure. Google as the largest technology service provider in the world, including Indonesia, plays an important role. This study aims to analyze G-Edu (Google for Education) in depth, from services, applications, programs, to their use as a digital-based learning support tool, which is very much needed, especially during the current pandemic. The study used a qualitative descriptive method where the data collection process used a library research method. Based on the explanation of the research results, it can be concluded that the G-Edu service provides support for, 1) learning media, 2) learning resources, and 3) teacher self-development partners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 to Indonesian Education and Its Relation to the Philosophy of “ Merdeka Belajar .” Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38–49.

Anna, Thora. (2004). Adapting Technology for School Improvement: A Global Perspective. In International Institute for Educational Planning.

Arumdani, I. M., Adi, B. W., & Muhammad Sabandi. (2018). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Situs Google Sebagai Sumber Belajar dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 4(2), 1–17.

Chertoff, J. D., Zarzour, J. G., Morgan, D. E., Lewis, P. J., Canon, C. L., & A., J. H. (2020). The Early Influence and Effects of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Resident Education and Adaptations. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 17(10), 1322–1328.

Fatmawati, N. I. (2019). Literasi Digital, mendidik anak di era digital bagi orang tua milenial. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 11(2), 119–138.

Knobe, M., & Lankshear, C. (2006). Digital literacy and digital literacies: Policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 1(1), 12–24.

Nazir, M. (1985). Metode Penelitian (Cetakan ke-1) (1st ed.). Ghalia Indonesia.

Inah, E. N. (2015). Peran komunikasi dalam interaksi guru dan siswa. Al-Ta’dib, 8(2), 150–167.

Rina, I. (2018). Aktivitas Guru Dan Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Di Sekolah Dasar. Pendas, 2(2), 261–267.

Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2017). The Importance of Promoting Digital Literacy in Higher Education. International Journal of Social Science Studies. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(6).

Saragih, S., & Zuhri, D. (2019). Teacher Behavior in Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability Development Teacher Behavior in Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability Development. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012006

Windyariani, S. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis Konteks Dan Kreativitas (Strategi Untuk Membelajarkan Sains Di Abad 21). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Toshpulatova, D., & Kinjemuratova, A. (2020). Teacher Perceptions on Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Academic English Module. International Journal of Psycho- Educational Sciences | Vol. 9, No. 1 London Academic Publishing, 9(1), 48–60.

Wirartha, I. M. (2006). Pedoman Penulisan Usulan Penelitian, Skripsi & Thesis. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Published

2021-04-16

How to Cite

Anggini, W. Y., & Harmoko, D. D. (2021). Digital Education: A Review of Google for Education. LITERATUS, 3(1), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v3i1.236
Abstract viewed = 114 times