Problematics of Judicial Connection in Handling Corruption Cases (Decision Number: 74/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst)

Authors

  • Oktoberiandi Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma University
  • Sujono Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma University
  • Sudarto Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v6i1.1673

Keywords:

justice, expediency, legal certainty

Abstract

A connectivity court is a court that functions to try criminal offenses committed jointly by civilians and members of the military (TNI), both general and special crimes, such as corruption. Provisions regarding koneksitas courts are regulated in detail in the Criminal Procedure Code, specifically in CHAPTER XI Article 89 to Article 94, as well as Article 198 to Article 203 in Law Number 31 of 1997 concerning Military Courts. However, in practice, when there is a criminal offense involving members of the TNI and civilians, the case should be resolved through a koneksitas mechanism. In reality, perpetrators are often tried in different courts, with TNI members being tried in military courts and civilian perpetrators in general courts. This creates disparity and ignores the principle of equality before the law, which in turn creates injustice. Law enforcers focus more on procedural justice than on achieving substantial justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Effendi, E. (2010). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Pidana. Alaf Riau.

Lamintang, P. A. F. (1984). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Dengan Pembahasan Secara Yuridis Menurut Yurisprudensi dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana. Sinarbaru.

Mulyana, Y. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap TNI Pangkat Titular yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Hukum. Universitas Pasundan, 2, 475.

Robbani, H. (2021). Halal Harmonization Development Opportunities: a Literature Study . Duoconommics, 1, 427–434.

Septiana, S., & Hamonangan, A. (2023). Kedudukan Peradilan Umum dan Peradilan Militer dalam Perkara Koneksitas Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia. Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Iblam.

Sokantan, S. (2011). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudarto, & Santoso, B. (2019). PENYELESAIAN KREDIT BERMASALAH PADA PERBANKAN INDONESIA. NOTARIUS, 12, 591–607.

Sujono. (2023). Peradilan Koneksitas Problematik Dan Prospektif. CV. Campustaka.

Yustisio, B. B., Sinaga, N. A., & Sujono. (2023). Pengaturan dan Implementasi Hubungan Industrial Pancasila Dalam Peraturan Perusahaan dan Perjanjian Kerja Bersama. Jurnal Hukum Sehasen, 9, 121–132.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-15

How to Cite

Oktoberiandi, O., Sujono, S., & Sudarto, S. (2024). Problematics of Judicial Connection in Handling Corruption Cases (Decision Number: 74/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst). LITERATUS, 6(1), 335–339. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v6i1.1673
Abstract viewed = 36 times