A Juridical Study on the Role of Justice collaborators in the Criminal Justice System for Drug Cases with the Death Penalty Threat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v6i1.1672Keywords:
legal analysis, narcotics, justice collaboratorAbstract
The increase in drug abuse among adults has been rising significantly. This can be observed through reports in electronic and print media, which daily cover the arrests of drug abusers. Authorities responsible for combating drug abuse include the National Narcotics Agency and the Indonesian National Police. Internationally, there are several conventions governing the use and distribution of narcotics issued by global organizations such as the United Nations, including the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961 (United Nations Conference for Adoption of a Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs 1961), the Convention on Manufacture and Distribution of Narcotic Drugs (Geneva 1931), and the Convention for the Suppression of Illicit Traffic in Dangerous Drugs (Geneva 1936). Furthermore, it is important to note that drug traffickers involved in the production, import, export, or distribution of Class I and II Narcotics can face the death penalty if the amount of narcotics distributed exceeds certain limits. The death penalty can also be applied to traffickers who engage in activities such as offering narcotics for sale, selling, purchasing, receiving, acting as an intermediary in transactions, exchanging, or delivering Class I and II Narcotics when the quantity exceeds a specified amount. In relation to law enforcement efforts, the term justice collaborator refers to a criminal offender who is willing to cooperate with law enforcement to expose certain organized criminal cases that pose a serious threat. These offenses include corruption, terrorism, narcotics, money laundering, human trafficking, and other organized crimes. In Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 4 of 2011, a justice collaborator is also referred to as a cooperating witness.
Downloads
References
Biro Komunikasi Dan Informasi Publik Kemenhub. (2024). Sosialisasi Asn Perhubungan Sehat, Bugar Dan Bersih Dari Narkoba. Kemenhub.Go.Id.
Laowo, Y. S. (2021). Pemidanaan Terhadap Pengguna Dan Pengedar Narkotika Di Pengadilan Negeri Medan. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 1.
Muhdlor, A. Z. (2012). Perkembangan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1.
Mulyadi, L. (2012). Pemidanaan Terhadap Pengedar Dan Pengguna Narkoba?: (Penelitian Asas, Teori, Norma Dan Praktik Penerapannya Dalam Putusan Pengadilan).
Noviyanti, E., Sinaga, N. A., & Sujono. (2024). Kewenangan Penyelidikan, Penyidikan Dan Penuntutan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Kpk). Jurnal Transparansi Hukum , 7(1).
Rabbani, H., & Romansyah, D. (2014). Analisis Dampak Uu No. 23 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pengelolaan Zakat Terhadap Eksistensi Dan Keberlangsungan Lembaga Amil Zakat (Studi Kasus Lembaga Amil Zakat Pkpu). Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 2(2), 117–146.
Suwarjono, A., Sinaga, N. A., & Sudarto. (2023). Keabsahan Risalah Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Tidak Memiliki Kekuatan Hukum. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains, 12(2). Https://Doi.Org/10.19109/Intelektualita.V12i2.18845
Wp, R. (2019). Aspek Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika: Rehabilitasi Versus Penjara (Menyoroti Pasal 127 Uu No.35 Tahun 2009). Penerbit Legality.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Syarif Nurhadi, Diding Rahmat, Sudarto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.