The Needs Technology Analysis for Farming Communities

Case Study: Chili Farming in Magelang District

Authors

  • Andreas Tri Panudju Universitas Bina Bangsa
  • Rina Nopianti Universitas Bina Bangsa
  • Rani Puspa Universitas Bina Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37010/kangmas.v2i2.263

Keywords:

chili, technology needs, technology, technology for farming

Abstract

Chile is one of the leading domestic commodities that almost spread across Indonesia and is required by almost every individual from a variety of social backgrounds. Indonesia's chili production has not met domestic requirements. The district of Magelang is one of the key places in chili that significantly contribute to the supply of central Java chili, a factor that continues to lack the capacity for farmers to grow. This paper aims to identify the need for chili farming technology, in this case the research was conducted in Magelang District, which is the largest chili center in Central Java. The method used in this research was a case study through a focus group discussion (FGD) approach involving 20 resource persons consisting of farmers, field extension officers, and the agricultural office of Magelang District. The productivity of the crop ranges from 1.6 to 4.6 tons per ha, while the production capacity varies from 12 to 17 tons per ha. Chili farming research was undertaken in 2020 on the technology requirements. Focus groups of 20 primary participants said chili production needs to be improved optimally, including information of pest control species (OPT) and farmers' broad awareness of the right culture. As a farmer companion in the field related to industry sub-systems management after culture/downstream, it must improve extension worker skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiyoga, W., Basuki, R. S., Hilman, Y., dan B. K. U. (2017). Studi “base line” identifikasi dan pengembangan teknologi PHT pada tanaman cabai di Jawa Barat.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2017). Jawa Tengah Dalam Angka Tahun 2017.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Jawa Tengah Dalam Angka Tahun 2018.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2019). Kabupaten Magelang Dalam Angka 2019.

Hadi, R. E. dan S. (2012). Pengembangan Agropolitan Sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Perdesaan dan Pembangunan Berimbang. P4W – IPB dan P3PT.

Hartuti, N. dan R. M. S. (2012). Pengaruh pemberian Sodium Metabisulfit dan suhu penyimpanan terhadap mutu dan daya simpan cabai merah. Bull. Penel. Hort, 65–75.

Kahana, P. B. (2013). Strategi Pengembangan Agribisnis Cabai Merah Di Kawasan Agropolitan Kabupaten Magelang. Universitas Diponegoro.

Kurnia U, et al. (2014). Teknologi Konservasi Budi Daya Sayuran Dataran Tinggi. In Buku lahan Kering Berlereng. Pusat Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Tanah Dan Agroklimat.

Moekasan TK, Laksminiwati Prabaningrum, dan M. L. R. (2015). Penerapan PHT Pada Sistem Tumpang Gilir Pada Bawang Merah dan Cabai Merah.

Munarso, M. dan S. J. (2016). Kontaminasi Residu Pestisida pada Cabai Merah, Selada, dan Bawang Merah (Studi Kasus di Bandungan dan Brebes Jawa Tengah serta Cianjur Jawa Barat). Jurnal Hortikultura, 19(1), 101–111.

Prajnanta. (2011). Mengatasi Permasalahan Bertanam Cabai. Penebar Swadaya.

Pramono, J., Ernawati, dan S. Y. J. (2012). Potensi hasil beberapa varietas jagung hibrida pada agroekosistem lahan sawah di kabupaten Klaten. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peran Teknologi Untuk Mewujudkan Kedaulatan Pangan Dan Peningkatan Perekonommian Bangsa.

Sukiyono. (2015). Faktor Penentu Tingkat Efisiensi Teknik Usahatani cabai Merah di Kecamatan selupu Rejang Kabupaten Rejang Lebong. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 23(2), 176–190.

Wahab, I, E. al. (2014). Laporan Akhir Kajian Identifikasi Kebutuhan Teknologi Dan Kelembagaan Spesifik Lokasi Mendukung Penetapan Prioritas Penelitian Dan Perencanaan Ke Depan Di Provinsi Jawa Tengah.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-14

How to Cite

Panudju, A. T., Nopianti, R. ., & Puspa, R. (2021). The Needs Technology Analysis for Farming Communities: Case Study: Chili Farming in Magelang District. KANGMAS: Karya Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.37010/kangmas.v2i2.263
Abstract viewed = 60 times