Qualitative Study of Management Effectiveness of Teacher Performance Evaluation at SMAK 7 Penabur Jakarta

Authors

  • Verry Albert Jekson Mardame Silalahi Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
  • Sri Sundari Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi
  • Marisi Pakpahan Institut Bisnis dan Multimedia asmi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37010/kangmas.v5i1.1514

Keywords:

teacher performance evaluation, evaluation management, teacher professionalism, education quality

Abstract

Teachers are a profession that guides and mentors students both in the school environment and outside of school. To improve the quality of education and teacher professionalism, teacher performance evaluation is very important. This study looks at how effective the management of teacher performance evaluation is at SMAK 7 PENABUR Jakarta. The goal is to find out what influences the performance evaluation and to make suggestions for improving the evaluation methods. Data was collected from teachers, principals, and support staff through observation, interviews, and checklists. The findings indicate that the management of performance evaluation depends on clear standards for evaluation, teacher participation in the evaluation process, and the use of evaluation results for professional development. Additionally, this study found issues with the current evaluation practices, such as a lack of resources and teacher disagreement. The results suggest that schools should improve communication between teachers and students and provide ongoing training on performance evaluation. This study shows that teacher performance evaluation management is crucial to improving teacher professionalism and education quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Firdaus, D. N. (2023, November). Optimalkan Potensi: Pentingnya Wawancara dalam Evaluasi Kinerja Profesional. Retrieved from ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375865655_Optimalkan_Potensi_Pentingnya_Wawancara_dalam_Evaluasi_Kinerja_Profesional

Hasibuan, E. (2021). Pandangan Kepala Sekolah tentang Evaluasi Kinerja Guru. Journal of Counseling, Education and Society, 2(1): 47. https://doi.org/10.29210/08jces133100

Mania, S. (2008). Teknik Non Tes: Telaah Atas Fungsi Wawancara Dan Kuesioner Dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan. Lentera Pendidikan?: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 11(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2008v11n1a4

Resolution, A. F. T. (2023). Teacher Development and Wellbeing. The Better Learning Research Review, 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009152167.002

Shutler, M., & Storbeck, J. (2002). Performance Management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(3): 245–246. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601345

Stronge, J. H. (2012). Teacher Evaluation and School Improvement: Improving the Educational Landscape1. Evaluating Teaching, 2–24. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412990202.d4

Tibo, P., Tobing, O. S. L. ., & Brutu, Y. T. (2022). The Role of Teachers in Developing Social Interactions of Children wits Disabilities in Extraordinary Schools C. KANGMAS: Karya Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(3): 151–157. https://doi.org/10.37010/kangmas.v3i3.903

Walidin, W., Saifullah, & Tabrani. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory. Banda Aceh: FTK Ar-Raniry Press .

Zakiyudin, A. (2020). Evaluasi Kinerja Guru dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan di Yayasan Sekolah Wirausaha Indonesia. Cakrawala-Jurnal Humaniora, 20(1): 16-24. http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/cakrawala%0Ahttps://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/cakrawala/article/view/6328

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Silalahi, V. A. J. M., Sundari, S., & Pakpahan, M. (2024). Qualitative Study of Management Effectiveness of Teacher Performance Evaluation at SMAK 7 Penabur Jakarta. KANGMAS: Karya Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.37010/kangmas.v5i1.1514
Abstract viewed = 105 times